Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35001 - 35010 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 35001 - 35010 of 83344 for case search.
State v. Sandra K.T.
. Sandra did not testify and rested when the State closed its case. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10703 - 2005-03-31
. Sandra did not testify and rested when the State closed its case. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10703 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith A. Franszczak
2002 WI App 141 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1393-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3994 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 141 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1393-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3994 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and one count of conspiracy to commit arson. Hudson sought postconviction relief, arguing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87028 - 2014-09-15
and one count of conspiracy to commit arson. Hudson sought postconviction relief, arguing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87028 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 We use the pseudonym “Nellie” to refer to the victim in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022512 - 2025-10-14
. 1 We use the pseudonym “Nellie” to refer to the victim in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022512 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the student in this case told him that she had performed oral sex on three other teachers does not fit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101867 - 2017-09-21
that the student in this case told him that she had performed oral sex on three other teachers does not fit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101867 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for a hearing de novo before the trial court. See Wis. Stat. § 757.69(8).[2] ¶6 The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36878 - 2009-06-22
for a hearing de novo before the trial court. See Wis. Stat. § 757.69(8).[2] ¶6 The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36878 - 2009-06-22
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2018 WI 26 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP112-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210740 - 2018-05-10
2018 WI 26 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP112-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210740 - 2018-05-10
2007 WI APP 198
2007 WI App 198 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2006AP2744-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29824 - 2007-08-27
2007 WI App 198 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2006AP2744-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29824 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
implied [consent] case law, or the subjective understanding of the accused[?]” (Some capitalization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115393 - 2017-09-21
implied [consent] case law, or the subjective understanding of the accused[?]” (Some capitalization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115393 - 2017-09-21
Charles J. Sassara v. Rick Braun
of the judgment. The court has the power to apply equitable remedies as necessary to meet the needs of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10035 - 2005-03-31
of the judgment. The court has the power to apply equitable remedies as necessary to meet the needs of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10035 - 2005-03-31