Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35001 - 35010 of 67812 for law.

Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
Law Office, Mauston. 2002 WI App 35 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31

WI App 21 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP142-CR Complete Title ...
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Daniel P. Fay and Erin K. Fay of Oakton Avenue Law Offices, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91545 - 2013-11-17

State v. Robert G. Harkey
to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. On the performance prong, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11081 - 2005-03-31

The Estate of Shawn Merrill v. Joseph Jerrick
act, does not create a new cause of action unknown to common law. See Miller v. Luther, 170 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15299 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bruce E. Black
N.W.2d 386 (1989). However, whether a search passes constitutional muster is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15693 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carl C. Martin
and law. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. The trial court's findings on what the attorney did, what happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7949 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Elaine Teichmiller v. Rogers Memorial Hospital Incorporated
of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13889 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to submit to a PBT if there is “probable cause to believe” the driver violated the OWI laws. See County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173557 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 190
of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Steven R. Cray of Wiley Law, S.C., Chippewa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26048 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as “law of the case.” P.X. argues in his reply brief that the “law of the case” doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214804 - 2018-06-26