Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35001 - 35010 of 63529 for records/1000.
Search results 35001 - 35010 of 63529 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, I agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236497 - 2019-02-28
of the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, I agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236497 - 2019-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude that summary disposition is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661935 - 2023-05-31
sentence. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude that summary disposition is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661935 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261319 - 2020-05-19
records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261319 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
its reasoning in exercising its discretion, this court independently reviews the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8889 - 2017-09-19
its reasoning in exercising its discretion, this court independently reviews the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8889 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerry L. Cox
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13643 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13643 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111770 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111770 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
no record cites[2] for this argument and indeed the argument ignores the State’s concession at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28738 - 2007-04-16
no record cites[2] for this argument and indeed the argument ignores the State’s concession at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28738 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
points out that the victim’s testimony was at times inconsistent, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71379 - 2014-09-15
points out that the victim’s testimony was at times inconsistent, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71379 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion without a hearing when “the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17
motion without a hearing when “the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1475-CRNM 2 the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922443 - 2025-03-05
. No. 2024AP1475-CRNM 2 the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922443 - 2025-03-05