Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35011 - 35020 of 83161 for case code.
Search results 35011 - 35020 of 83161 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463976 - 2021-12-22
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463976 - 2021-12-22
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107857 - 2014-02-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107857 - 2014-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160533 - 2017-09-21
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160533 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene Nichols
sentence in a particular case. As a result, a judge imposing a sentence in one case cannot be bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
sentence in a particular case. As a result, a judge imposing a sentence in one case cannot be bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role in contacting the police, corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101852 - 2013-09-16
was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role in contacting the police, corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101852 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848040 - 2024-09-10
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848040 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
Terry v. City of Owen
to support the jury’s determination, and the City is not entitled to a new trial, we affirm. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12143 - 2017-09-21
to support the jury’s determination, and the City is not entitled to a new trial, we affirm. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FA-611; Order to Enforce Physical Placement Order
the name of the county in which the original case was filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT
/formdisplay/FA-611.pdf?formNumber=FA-611&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-09
the name of the county in which the original case was filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT
/formdisplay/FA-611.pdf?formNumber=FA-611&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228718 - 2018-11-26
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228718 - 2018-11-26
State v. Jo Ann Leszcynski
of Transportation, in a different case, City of Superior v. Curran, Douglas County, WI, Case No. 04‑TR-2490-92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18383 - 2005-05-31
of Transportation, in a different case, City of Superior v. Curran, Douglas County, WI, Case No. 04‑TR-2490-92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18383 - 2005-05-31