Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35021 - 35030 of 59340 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35021 - 35030 of 59340 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed not to have received certain canteen food items that he had ordered, some of which were later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93611 - 2014-09-15
claimed not to have received certain canteen food items that he had ordered, some of which were later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93611 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mylea Wirkus
earlier, a claim that the police failed to exercise reasonable diligence in providing a suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
earlier, a claim that the police failed to exercise reasonable diligence in providing a suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary Ann Strnad v. Edward Strnad
of that income.” ¶9 The court concluded that Mary Ann’s arguments defeat the change of character claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4220 - 2017-09-19
of that income.” ¶9 The court concluded that Mary Ann’s arguments defeat the change of character claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
the result of his trial. We reject his claim that the real controversy was not fully tried and that newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
the result of his trial. We reject his claim that the real controversy was not fully tried and that newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
happened to it. ¶5 Wolf filed both a motion to suppress, claiming there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34358 - 2014-09-15
happened to it. ¶5 Wolf filed both a motion to suppress, claiming there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34358 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the prosecution refused to disclose as part of discovery. He also claims entitlement to resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
that the prosecution refused to disclose as part of discovery. He also claims entitlement to resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
State v. Paul Johnson
denial of an evidentiary hearing de novo). However, we address Johnson’s claim on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15287 - 2005-03-31
denial of an evidentiary hearing de novo). However, we address Johnson’s claim on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15287 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the no-merit report addresses whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that Richter is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164168 - 2017-09-21
, the no-merit report addresses whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that Richter is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by appellate counsel in the no-merit report is whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711562 - 2023-10-11
by appellate counsel in the no-merit report is whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711562 - 2023-10-11
State v. Ralph Anton
of Counsel In order to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Anton has to show: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10427 - 2005-03-31
of Counsel In order to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Anton has to show: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10427 - 2005-03-31