Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35021 - 35030 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35021 - 35030 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
was not working, it would be appropriate for Harris to claim the exemptions. ¶5 In response to Tanner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
was not working, it would be appropriate for Harris to claim the exemptions. ¶5 In response to Tanner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant forfeits the right to raise nonjurisdictional defects and defenses—including claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
, a defendant forfeits the right to raise nonjurisdictional defects and defenses—including claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
Craig S.G. v. State
. The instant case deals with a claim that the third protection has been violated. See id. Double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10552 - 2017-09-20
. The instant case deals with a claim that the third protection has been violated. See id. Double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10552 - 2017-09-20
Kevin K. Parman v. Jeffrey D. Ogden
of the sound attenuation work described in the agreement, the Parmans would release their claims against Ogden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6997 - 2005-03-31
of the sound attenuation work described in the agreement, the Parmans would release their claims against Ogden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6997 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the tape. He had no idea what happened to it. ¶5 Wolf filed both a motion to suppress, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34358 - 2008-10-20
the tape. He had no idea what happened to it. ¶5 Wolf filed both a motion to suppress, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34358 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Bruce H. Mallow
, Mallow claims error in the trial court’s refusal to allow Mallow to use a field sobriety test training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16303 - 2017-09-21
, Mallow claims error in the trial court’s refusal to allow Mallow to use a field sobriety test training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16303 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of certiorari. The court therefore held that “[a]ny claim related to the legality of the underlying punishment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102068 - 2013-09-16
of certiorari. The court therefore held that “[a]ny claim related to the legality of the underlying punishment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102068 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23