Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35021 - 35030 of 55265 for n c.

[PDF] JC-1648 Priority Placement Order (Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children)
to be placed with the same proposed placement resource. c. The child has a substantial relationship
/formdisplay/JC-1648.pdf?formNumber=JC-1648&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-11-24

[PDF] Rule Order
federally recognized Indian tribes; if proposed Wis. Stat. § 887.24(3)(c), permitting issuance
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137530 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that [his] [c]hapter 51 commitment ends, his continued placement at Mendota” would be improper under solely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60129 - 2011-02-16

Iola Vision v. Paul Vermeern
County is proper. See § 801.50(2)(c), Stats. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31

Arthur T. Donaldson v. Town Board of the Town of Beloit
. Affirmed. Before Eich, C.J., Vergeront, J., and Paul C. Gartzke, Reserve Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9953 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] REVISED - May a former judge who currently serves as a reserve judge, use the title judge, designation reservejudge, or be pictured in judicial robes in advertising services for hire as a mediator or arbitrator?
(2). C. SCR 60.05 SCR 60.05 states: A judge shall so conduct the judge's extra
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 110
incapacity. (c) The misconduct justifies substantially different discipline in this state
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88083 - 2014-09-15

Brown County v. AFSCME Local 1901-F
for extending or modifying the law. See Wis. Stat. § 809.25(3)(c)2. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19110 - 2005-07-25

Ann E. Burton v. Michael S. Fish
argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.” Rule 809.25(3)(c). Although we give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Levi Hogner
ignored the minimum mandatory thirty-day jail sentence plainly required by § 346.65(2)(c), STATS. Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12321 - 2017-09-21