Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35041 - 35050 of 91113 for 1.
Search results 35041 - 35050 of 91113 for 1.
[PDF]
State v. David L. Kelly
and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. David L. Kelly appeals from a judgment of conviction of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3317 - 2017-09-19
and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. David L. Kelly appeals from a judgment of conviction of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3317 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Gundrum, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81364 - 2014-09-15
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Gundrum, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81364 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Debra Markwardt v. John Valcq
. No. 2005AP309 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Debra Markwardt and the estate of her deceased sister, Judith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20304 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP309 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Debra Markwardt and the estate of her deceased sister, Judith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Sherman and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93172 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Sherman and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Kneer v. James M. Sarkauskas
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9302 - 2017-09-19
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9302 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael G.
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] The sole issue on appeal is whether Michael G.’s two confessions made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] The sole issue on appeal is whether Michael G.’s two confessions made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Hagedorn, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Matthew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163237 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Hagedorn, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Matthew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163237 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and KITTY K. BRENNAN, Judges. Affirmed. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Michael G. Kachelski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
and KITTY K. BRENNAN, Judges. Affirmed. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Michael G. Kachelski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: DEE R. DYER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel Wolf appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34358 - 2008-10-20
: DEE R. DYER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel Wolf appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34358 - 2008-10-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: elsa c. lamelas and jeffrey a. kremers, Judges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31766 - 2008-02-11
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: elsa c. lamelas and jeffrey a. kremers, Judges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31766 - 2008-02-11