Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35041 - 35050 of 83201 for case code.
Search results 35041 - 35050 of 83201 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis C. Gandy
BROWN, P.J.1 The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16159 - 2017-09-21
BROWN, P.J.1 The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We reverse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403218 - 2021-08-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We reverse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403218 - 2021-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Nelson
probable cause to arrest him. We disagree. Whether the facts of a given case constitute probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18275 - 2017-09-21
probable cause to arrest him. We disagree. Whether the facts of a given case constitute probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227745 - 2018-11-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227745 - 2018-11-19
[PDF]
Matthew S. Peterson v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
test was satisfied under the facts in this case. In support, he cites two decisions of this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14278 - 2014-09-15
test was satisfied under the facts in this case. In support, he cites two decisions of this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14278 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lee R. Crouthers
, but the trial court denied the motion. On appeal, we certified the case to the supreme court, requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4663 - 2005-03-31
, but the trial court denied the motion. On appeal, we certified the case to the supreme court, requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4663 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role in contacting the police, corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101852 - 2013-09-16
was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role in contacting the police, corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101852 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to get money in the future and present a case for something that’s happening in the future. If that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88193 - 2014-09-15
to get money in the future and present a case for something that’s happening in the future. If that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88193 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170309 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160533 - 2017-09-21
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160533 - 2017-09-21