Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35061 - 35070 of 68502 for did.
Search results 35061 - 35070 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
struck the adult victim multiple times and did not allow her to leave the vehicle. Eventually Ziedman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
struck the adult victim multiple times and did not allow her to leave the vehicle. Eventually Ziedman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
Attorney Pierquet for a copy and did not receive one. ¶7 On July 9, 2002, Attorney Pierquet filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
Attorney Pierquet for a copy and did not receive one. ¶7 On July 9, 2002, Attorney Pierquet filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
12/14/2021.” The District did not respond to Gierl’s amended request. On February 22, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
12/14/2021.” The District did not respond to Gierl’s amended request. On February 22, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
applied the statutory requirements to those facts. Id. ¶7 P.H. did not dispute before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
applied the statutory requirements to those facts. Id. ¶7 P.H. did not dispute before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, he did not exercise it. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105383 - 2013-12-12
right to file a response, he did not exercise it. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105383 - 2013-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
with the situation where the trial judge who imposed the revocation sentence did so without reviewing the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
with the situation where the trial judge who imposed the revocation sentence did so without reviewing the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
Judith L. Posner v. Jeffry A. Posner
that because the parties did not contest the issue, there was nothing for the court to decide. She concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8026 - 2005-03-31
that because the parties did not contest the issue, there was nothing for the court to decide. She concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, primarily because the officer did not conduct field sobriety tests. We conclude that in view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100745 - 2013-08-14
, primarily because the officer did not conduct field sobriety tests. We conclude that in view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100745 - 2013-08-14
State v. Justin F.
delinquent but that his behavior did not result in great bodily injury. The court cited the motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12443 - 2005-03-31
delinquent but that his behavior did not result in great bodily injury. The court cited the motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
malfunctioned. ¶4 Stauffenecker did not testify that Engfer improperly read the informing the accused form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29206 - 2014-09-15
malfunctioned. ¶4 Stauffenecker did not testify that Engfer improperly read the informing the accused form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29206 - 2014-09-15