Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 61720 for does.

COURT OF APPEALS
failed does not constitute deficient performance. See McMahon, 186 Wis. 2d at 80. ¶12 Robin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35052 - 2008-12-29

[PDF] WI APP 111
does not challenge the initial stop. Thus, the only issue is whether House’s detention after Hoell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100845 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John P. Livesey, Sr. v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.
of a transaction in land which does not satisfy one or more of the formal requirements of § 706.02, STATS., we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11967 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
technically does not apply to this case,[1] we are satisfied that the circuit court’s sentencing remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] State v. Brian J. Block
1 Block requests a new trial as his remedy and does not contend that there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21774 - 2017-09-21

State v. Larry W. Norris
and plainly distinct from that in § 939.63(1)(a). The statute’s language does not suggest a nexus requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John A. Gatt
fifty pounds or more overweight. On redirect he explained that this does not necessarily mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the record does not show that the circuit court made the individualized determination of unfitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132014 - 2017-09-21

WI App 146 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1377-CR Complete Titl...
is consistent with the rationale of the circuit court which we affirmed in Jones. Long does not contend that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72346 - 2011-11-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
determination was not egregious. A single missed appearance for a pre-trial hearing does not rise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696961 - 2023-08-29