Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 69024 for had.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 69024 for had.
State v. Carlton B. Campbell
that Campbell was a repeater and that he had three previous misdemeanor convictions in Dane County Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9503 - 2005-03-31
that Campbell was a repeater and that he had three previous misdemeanor convictions in Dane County Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9503 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The court asked whether anyone on the prospective juror panel had a “close, casual or nodding acquaintance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94931 - 2013-04-03
The court asked whether anyone on the prospective juror panel had a “close, casual or nodding acquaintance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94931 - 2013-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 7, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
testified that Wright had twice bribed her to submit recantation letters, stating that she lied about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96459 - 2013-05-06
testified that Wright had twice bribed her to submit recantation letters, stating that she lied about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96459 - 2013-05-06
State v. Rick L. Edwards
] The trial court denied Edwards’ request for credit because the court had stayed the confinement time while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6310 - 2005-03-31
] The trial court denied Edwards’ request for credit because the court had stayed the confinement time while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Dodge County
had changed to Waukesha County because he was a minor whose parents had lived in Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14669 - 2017-09-21
had changed to Waukesha County because he was a minor whose parents had lived in Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts that, had the court properly informed him that he was losing the right to use firearms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
asserts that, had the court properly informed him that he was losing the right to use firearms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that grounds had been proven to support the State’s request that Gabriel S. be found unfit, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62968 - 2014-09-15
that grounds had been proven to support the State’s request that Gabriel S. be found unfit, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62968 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth R. McGrew
; and (3) that he had a constitutional right to a twelve-person jury and therefore Wis. Stat. § 756.06(2)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4570 - 2005-03-31
; and (3) that he had a constitutional right to a twelve-person jury and therefore Wis. Stat. § 756.06(2)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4570 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts that, had the court properly informed him that he was losing the right to use firearms for hunting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92889 - 2013-02-13
asserts that, had the court properly informed him that he was losing the right to use firearms for hunting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92889 - 2013-02-13
Magnum Radio, Inc. v. Ronald Brieske
, claiming, among other things, that Brieske had intentionally interfered with Magnum’s contract to purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13050 - 2005-03-31
, claiming, among other things, that Brieske had intentionally interfered with Magnum’s contract to purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13050 - 2005-03-31