Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment declaring that Geoffrey and Edith Maclay own a parcel of land claimed by both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
appeals from a judgment declaring that Geoffrey and Edith Maclay own a parcel of land claimed by both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
[PDF]
State v. John G. Yager
to the refusal issue because Yager claims that his refusal was based on the belief that he was misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14694 - 2017-09-21
to the refusal issue because Yager claims that his refusal was based on the belief that he was misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14694 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael Mirr
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14118 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
Leinweber over. ¶4 Leinweber testified to a different scenario. He claimed that Webber could not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2225 - 2017-09-19
Leinweber over. ¶4 Leinweber testified to a different scenario. He claimed that Webber could not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2225 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 275, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971), Smejkal claims a maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 275, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971), Smejkal claims a maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
credit in Walker’s Milwaukee case renders any claim for additional sentence credit in the present case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197190 - 2017-10-04
credit in Walker’s Milwaukee case renders any claim for additional sentence credit in the present case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197190 - 2017-10-04
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1405&year=2021
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1405&year=2021
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=929&year=2017
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=929&year=2017
COURT OF APPEALS
: David c. resheske, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Daniel J. Sauer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34697 - 2008-11-25
: David c. resheske, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Daniel J. Sauer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34697 - 2008-11-25
Gerald T. Carroll v. Town of Balsam Lake
of the filing of Plaintiffs' claim. 3. There has been no expenditure of funds on the road for the past 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10718 - 2005-03-31
of the filing of Plaintiffs' claim. 3. There has been no expenditure of funds on the road for the past 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10718 - 2005-03-31