Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35081 - 35090 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35081 - 35090 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
obligated to share the bank accounts with Gregory but that Gregory might have a legal claim that Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
obligated to share the bank accounts with Gregory but that Gregory might have a legal claim that Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
Mark Taylor v. Daniel Bertrand
. Although he raises several claims, one is dispositive. We conclude that under the recent case of State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15376 - 2005-03-31
. Although he raises several claims, one is dispositive. We conclude that under the recent case of State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15376 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles L. Stewart
in possession of a firearm, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4349 - 2005-03-31
in possession of a firearm, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4349 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Grey C.B.
under § 51.20(13)(g)(1) and (3), Stats. He claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14248 - 2005-03-31
under § 51.20(13)(g)(1) and (3), Stats. He claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14248 - 2005-03-31
Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
status. In September 1995, Baker was terminated. Thereafter, Baker brought this action, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11929 - 2005-03-31
status. In September 1995, Baker was terminated. Thereafter, Baker brought this action, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11929 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Harris
), 161.01(14), Stats., and of carrying a concealed weapon, see § 941.23, Stats. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
), 161.01(14), Stats., and of carrying a concealed weapon, see § 941.23, Stats. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice Clark
of § 813.125(7), Stats. Clark claims the trial court should have dismissed the criminal charge because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31
of § 813.125(7), Stats. Clark claims the trial court should have dismissed the criminal charge because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31
State v. Katrina D. Campbell
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02).[1] Campbell claims the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02).[1] Campbell claims the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Alvegas Hamilton
has a gun. Hamilton also claims that the trial court erred when it permitted Mack to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18149 - 2005-05-17
has a gun. Hamilton also claims that the trial court erred when it permitted Mack to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18149 - 2005-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23