Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35081 - 35090 of 63187 for records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and Records, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981681 - 2025-07-16

[PDF] State v. Nicholas V. Maiorano
in nature, or if the record conclusively shows the appellant is not entitled to relief, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26087 - 2017-09-21

State v. Amy McGee
that the subject search warrant was included in the appellate record. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis.2d 10, 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9852 - 2005-03-31

Alfred Seals v. David Mandell
decisions, we independently examine the record to determine whether any genuine issue of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8421 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181 Wis. 2d at 122, 123. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30637 - 2007-10-17

State v. James R.K.
a dismissal of the action “without order of court” as defined in Wis. Stat. § 805.04(1). The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4445 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eric R. George
be stricken from the record. I would object to it. THE COURT: So ordered. The jury is instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4497 - 2017-09-19

State v. Richard R. Burch
Unit Officer Scott Wasemiller so that Wasemiller could hear and record the conversations. Some months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9952 - 2005-03-31

Carolyn Rae Jarman v. Larry Howard Welter
the percentage standard, the court shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21398 - 2006-03-22

Andrew J. Peterson v. Andrew S. Peterson
of their filings, Andrew and MariLynn simply allege that summary judgment was inappropriate because “[t]he record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31