Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35081 - 35090 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
, 656. We note that this constitutional argument was not raised in the trial court. Although Montoya’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16253 - 2005-03-31

T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
of the court’s remand, and on appeal presents several claims of trial court error. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sean W. Ottman
. Ottman then filed motions requesting that his sentence be credited with the thirty days, but the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
him, following a jury trial, of an eighth offense of operating a motor vehicle under the influence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John A. Gatt
of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
., appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of armed robbery with use of force
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250907 - 2019-12-04

[PDF] County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
intoxicated. He now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Aussem first argues the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5736 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jessie M. Cox v. Gerald Cox
that Jessie was “not living with” the Coxes at the time of the injury and we therefore affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10620 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
of the court’s remand, and on appeal presents several claims of trial court error. We affirm. ¶2 Francois
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2293 - 2017-09-19

County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
appeals. Discussion ¶5 Aussem first argues the trial court erred when it concluded that Wallace had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31