Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35081 - 35090 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 35081 - 35090 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
John P. Livesey, Sr. v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.
standards employed by the trial court. See Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11967 - 2017-09-21
standards employed by the trial court. See Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11967 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court took the motion under advisement until after the verdict was returned.[1] The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33908 - 2008-09-02
. The trial court took the motion under advisement until after the verdict was returned.[1] The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33908 - 2008-09-02
State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
, 656. We note that this constitutional argument was not raised in the trial court. Although Montoya’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16253 - 2005-03-31
, 656. We note that this constitutional argument was not raised in the trial court. Although Montoya’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16253 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
behavior with an age peer….” ¶4 Prior to the trial, Young pointed out that the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2009-01-12
behavior with an age peer….” ¶4 Prior to the trial, Young pointed out that the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2009-01-12
John P. Livesey, Sr. v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11967 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11967 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43675 - 2009-11-24
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43675 - 2009-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
by testimony at trial from Dr. Anthony Jurek, who diagnosed Staats with Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27905 - 2014-09-15
by testimony at trial from Dr. Anthony Jurek, who diagnosed Staats with Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27905 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
-in-chief, Martin moved for dismissal. The trial court took the motion under advisement until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
-in-chief, Martin moved for dismissal. The trial court took the motion under advisement until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
statute. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Continental because it found that WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32337 - 2014-09-15
statute. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Continental because it found that WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32337 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had committed a traffic violation or probable cause that he had committed a crime. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27
that he had committed a traffic violation or probable cause that he had committed a crime. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27