Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 27089 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Estimasi Biaya Renovasi Rumah Type 70 Minimalis Terpercaya Sawangan Kab Magelang.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
88, ¶72, 357 Wis. 2d 1, 850 N.W.2d 915 (citing Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454297 - 2021-11-23

CA Blank Order
Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). At sentencing, the trial court must consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96730 - 2013-05-08

Vadim Katznelson v. Stuart Hoffman
dismissal of the battery claim under Martin by Scoptur v. Richards, 192 Wis.2d 156, 170-173, 531 N.W.2d 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jason M. Mulroy
the circumstances.” Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). ¶6 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6594 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
is a discretionary determination. See Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). Refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27189 - 2006-11-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was excessive, see Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). At sentencing, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162228 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Anaconda American Brass Co., 70 Wis. 2d 632, 634-35, 235 N.W.2d 283 (1975), the affidavit recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98255 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
that the imposed sentence is so excessive or unusual so as to shock public sentiment. See Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91806 - 2013-01-22

[PDF] NOTICE
court assigns to each factor is a discretionary determination. See Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27189 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Professional Guardianships, Inc. v. Ruth E. J.
of medical treatment. See In re L.W., 167 Wis.2d 53, 78-81, nn.11 and 12, 482 N.W.2d 60, 69-70 nn. 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9411 - 2017-09-19