Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 91488 for affidavit of service from.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 91488 for affidavit of service from.
COURT OF APPEALS
the affidavits constitute new evidence. Nothing prevented Soto from collecting similar affidavit evidence prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117052 - 2014-07-14
the affidavits constitute new evidence. Nothing prevented Soto from collecting similar affidavit evidence prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117052 - 2014-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Soto from collecting similar affidavit evidence prior to the July 11, 2011 hearing, and a lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117052 - 2017-09-21
Soto from collecting similar affidavit evidence prior to the July 11, 2011 hearing, and a lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117052 - 2017-09-21
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
Medical Examining Board, Respondent-Respondent. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
Medical Examining Board, Respondent-Respondent. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa County: WILLIAM D. DYKE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19708 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa County: WILLIAM D. DYKE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19708 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
inference from Deputy Hartwig’s report. Nothing in Pluemer’s affidavit provides a basis for finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21
inference from Deputy Hartwig’s report. Nothing in Pluemer’s affidavit provides a basis for finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Forest County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36959 - 2009-06-29
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Forest County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36959 - 2009-06-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence obtained from the search, arguing the affidavit supporting the warrant failed to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36959 - 2014-09-15
evidence obtained from the search, arguing the affidavit supporting the warrant failed to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36959 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and in the interest of justice. Lipscomb’s motion relied on an affidavit from Marcus Glenn, who swore that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
and in the interest of justice. Lipscomb’s motion relied on an affidavit from Marcus Glenn, who swore that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and in the interest of justice. Lipscomb’s motion relied on an affidavit from Marcus Glenn, who swore that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
and in the interest of justice. Lipscomb’s motion relied on an affidavit from Marcus Glenn, who swore that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it denied his motion to suppress the evidence from the search. He asserts that the affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893031 - 2024-12-26
it denied his motion to suppress the evidence from the search. He asserts that the affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893031 - 2024-12-26