Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 4770 for ft.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 4770 for ft.
Linda M. Goberville v. Brad J. Goberville
2005 WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-2440-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-2440-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 228
.” Id. at 1021. However, the court “le[ft] for another day … the question whether any exceptions exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26934 - 2006-11-20
.” Id. at 1021. However, the court “le[ft] for another day … the question whether any exceptions exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26934 - 2006-11-20
Jeffrey S. Hacker v. Nancy M. Hacker
2005 WI App 211 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP223-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19164 - 2005-09-19
2005 WI App 211 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP223-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19164 - 2005-09-19
Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1369-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1369-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
of. State v. Allen, No. 01-0381-FT, unpublished slip op., ¶2 (WI App Sept. 19, 2001). (continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6198 - 2017-09-19
of. State v. Allen, No. 01-0381-FT, unpublished slip op., ¶2 (WI App Sept. 19, 2001). (continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6198 - 2017-09-19
State v. Winnebago County
for future development. [We] allowed 33 ft. for a roadway. Presently the requirements are 50 ft. wide. [We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
for future development. [We] allowed 33 ft. for a roadway. Presently the requirements are 50 ft. wide. [We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1821-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1821-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2005-03-31
Rachel Jensen v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company
Reports. No. 95-2953-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9878 - 2005-03-31
Reports. No. 95-2953-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9878 - 2005-03-31
Gladys Jean Jones v. Eddie Jones
, Stats. No. 98-0379-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13611 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. No. 98-0379-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13611 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2009AP2049-FT Cir. Ct. No. 2008CV1013 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46416 - 2010-01-27
. Appeal No. 2009AP2049-FT Cir. Ct. No. 2008CV1013 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46416 - 2010-01-27