Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 64819 for records.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 64819 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214494 - 2018-06-20
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214494 - 2018-06-20
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100090 - 2013-07-30
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100090 - 2013-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issued. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239999 - 2019-04-29
issued. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239999 - 2019-04-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116148 - 2014-07-08
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116148 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP489-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we required appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108099 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP489-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we required appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103043 - 2017-09-21
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99852 - 2017-09-21
report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99852 - 2017-09-21
Darryl M. Bunker v. David H. Schwarz
not properly record the chain of custody, and did not honor his request for retesting. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6977 - 2005-03-31
not properly record the chain of custody, and did not honor his request for retesting. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6977 - 2005-03-31