Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 6188 for sheriff.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 6188 for sheriff.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s deputies were bound by the constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31
that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s deputies were bound by the constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley R. Scott
County Sheriff’s Department was patrolling Darbo Drive when he saw Stanley Scott walking on a sidewalk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11689 - 2017-09-20
County Sheriff’s Department was patrolling Darbo Drive when he saw Stanley Scott walking on a sidewalk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11689 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Francisco Hernandez-Rosas
at her residence between Hernandez-Rosas and his wife that resulted in Bessette calling the sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6251 - 2017-09-19
at her residence between Hernandez-Rosas and his wife that resulted in Bessette calling the sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6251 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s department sergeant who stopped Troka’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s department sergeant who stopped Troka’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. When deputies from the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department arrived, K.D. told them he could still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707827 - 2023-09-26
. When deputies from the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department arrived, K.D. told them he could still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707827 - 2023-09-26
State v. Eugene A. Pagois
of the Kenosha County Sheriff's Department. Ide returned Pagois to the parking lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9135 - 2005-03-31
of the Kenosha County Sheriff's Department. Ide returned Pagois to the parking lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9135 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff’s department. ¶4 Decker appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Decker challenges the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91968 - 2013-01-23
sheriff’s department. ¶4 Decker appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Decker challenges the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91968 - 2013-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
other than Kim; (2) Burnett County Sheriff’s Department reports containing allegations of sexual abuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=430580 - 2021-09-28
other than Kim; (2) Burnett County Sheriff’s Department reports containing allegations of sexual abuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=430580 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Zeilinger
Sheriff’s Department both monitored a dispatch call reporting suspicious activity on State Highway 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6104 - 2017-09-19
Sheriff’s Department both monitored a dispatch call reporting suspicious activity on State Highway 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6104 - 2017-09-19