Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2001
199 817 Average filings per judge 248 213 246 168 214 No Merits 230 176 114 100 620 Writs 70 29 27 53
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32 - 2005-03-31
199 817 Average filings per judge 248 213 246 168 214 No Merits 230 176 114 100 620 Writs 70 29 27 53
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32 - 2005-03-31
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2005
*Adjusted average/judge 193 198 204 175 191 No Merits 242 135 133 126 636 Writs 56 42 19 44 161 Granted 8
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25252 - 2006-05-18
*Adjusted average/judge 193 198 204 175 191 No Merits 242 135 133 126 636 Writs 56 42 19 44 161 Granted 8
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25252 - 2006-05-18
[PDF]
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
, P.J., Eich and Vergeront, JJ. VERGERONT, J. Donald Savinski appeals an order quashing a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
, P.J., Eich and Vergeront, JJ. VERGERONT, J. Donald Savinski appeals an order quashing a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
a continuing economic benefit in the form of rents and, therefore, a continuous period of forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
a continuing economic benefit in the form of rents and, therefore, a continuous period of forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Supreme Court denied Burr’s petition for writ of certiorari. See Burr v. Pollard, 546 F.3d 828 (7th Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99863 - 2017-09-21
Supreme Court denied Burr’s petition for writ of certiorari. See Burr v. Pollard, 546 F.3d 828 (7th Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99863 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that his detention in prison is unlawful because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221237 - 2018-11-16
petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that his detention in prison is unlawful because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221237 - 2018-11-16
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2022
under Wis. Stat. §§ 146.84, 806.04, and 813.01, in the form of an injunction barring planned release
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483626 - 2022-02-09
under Wis. Stat. §§ 146.84, 806.04, and 813.01, in the form of an injunction barring planned release
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483626 - 2022-02-09
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Elvis C. Banks
Attorney Banks' representation of a Mr. Guerra. Attorney Banks agreed to file a Petition for Writ
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16649 - 2005-03-31
Attorney Banks' representation of a Mr. Guerra. Attorney Banks agreed to file a Petition for Writ
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16649 - 2005-03-31
Robert J. Hanson v. Town of Porter Board of Adjustment
of the permit. The Hansons and Hoppe then sought certiorari review of the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13613 - 2005-03-31
of the permit. The Hansons and Hoppe then sought certiorari review of the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13613 - 2005-03-31
Mark E. Hoppe v. Town of Porter Board of Adjustment
of the permit. The Hansons and Hoppe then sought certiorari review of the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31
of the permit. The Hansons and Hoppe then sought certiorari review of the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31