Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35101 - 35110 of 98489 for civil court case status online.

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 29, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32845 - 2008-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 21, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68297 - 2011-07-20

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30167 - 2007-09-04

COURT OF APPEALS
insists that in valuing the business, “the court should look to case law relating to property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34522 - 2008-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36802 - 2009-06-16

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS
to “retry” the case by asking this court to disturb the trial court’s credibility determinations and factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31274 - 2007-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 4, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72293 - 2011-10-17