Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35111 - 35120 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35111 - 35120 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
granted his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
granted his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Huppeler
motion to modify his sentence. Huppeler claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14235 - 2014-09-15
motion to modify his sentence. Huppeler claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14235 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2012AP2649-CR 2 denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He argues he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
No. 2012AP2649-CR 2 denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He argues he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Pruett filed a postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his plea and claiming his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
. Pruett filed a postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his plea and claiming his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 68
his motion to suppress.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2 The essential facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
his motion to suppress.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2 The essential facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
] Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion challenged the trial court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
] Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion challenged the trial court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
her postconviction motion. Smith contends the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251613 - 2019-12-18
her postconviction motion. Smith contends the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251613 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or subsequent offense. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Appointed appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=565192 - 2022-09-13
or subsequent offense. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Appointed appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=565192 - 2022-09-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26