Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35131 - 35140 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35131 - 35140 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
in criminal proceedings. Sahs claims that Agent Krause check-marked this notification on the form, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
in criminal proceedings. Sahs claims that Agent Krause check-marked this notification on the form, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
State v. James E. Lipscomb
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lipscomb claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18837 - 2005-07-05
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lipscomb claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18837 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Mitchell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445511 - 2021-10-27
, Mitchell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445511 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
CA Blank Order
that standard. First, the record does not support Ross’s claim of undue pressure from his counsel to accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2015-04-13
that standard. First, the record does not support Ross’s claim of undue pressure from his counsel to accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2015-04-13
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jenelle Glasbrenner
at the number of irregular claims that had been submitted, and she immediately apologized. During
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17883 - 2017-09-21
at the number of irregular claims that had been submitted, and she immediately apologized. During
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, employs a new-factor analysis so as to correct specific problems, id., or considers a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202021 - 2017-11-15
, employs a new-factor analysis so as to correct specific problems, id., or considers a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202021 - 2017-11-15
State v. Jeris M. Moore
an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25748 - 2006-08-29
an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25748 - 2006-08-29