Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35131 - 35140 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 35131 - 35140 of 83945 for case search.
[PDF]
Patrick DeMauro v. Peter R. Szukis
and reverse the judgment. This case is a foreclosure action by DeMauro against Szukis. After trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12434 - 2017-09-21
and reverse the judgment. This case is a foreclosure action by DeMauro against Szukis. After trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12434 - 2017-09-21
Gary K. Augustine v. Douglas Makos
the trial court's judicial assistant that the case had been settled and, therefore, the case was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9983 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's judicial assistant that the case had been settled and, therefore, the case was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9983 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
[PDF]
Benny J. Bridges v. Thomas Karlen
Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17834 - 2017-09-21
Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17834 - 2017-09-21
B&W Properties v. Jacqueline Omeziri
in this case commenced on November 1, 2000, for a term of twelve months until October 31, 2001. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4081 - 2005-03-31
in this case commenced on November 1, 2000, for a term of twelve months until October 31, 2001. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4081 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kristen K. Gamer
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
[PDF]
Rule Order
a possibility of harm to unsuspecting individuals, such as the abandonment of a client's case or the loss
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115410 - 2017-09-21
a possibility of harm to unsuspecting individuals, such as the abandonment of a client's case or the loss
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115410 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185412 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185412 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
, 324 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1982). Balli urges us to review the case on the merits, explaining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19
, 324 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1982). Balli urges us to review the case on the merits, explaining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19