Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35131 - 35140 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Tonya B.
. and Destiney S. Tonya argues the trial court violated her due process rights when it failed to hear testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dwight Gustafson
while intoxicated, second offense. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2152 - 2005-03-31

Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
and employment benefits arising out of her work as a cook at the county jail. The trial court concluded that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31

State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
of certiorari[2] with the trial court requesting that his probation be reinstated. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13111 - 2005-03-31

Michael Kidd v. Dianna L. McMaster
the trial court erred by finding that Federal Express is not a statutorily approved method of transporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6030 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John P. Hunt
also Pet'r App. at 129-30. We note that the trial court record refers to Shillcutt as Shillcut
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16474 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
imprisonment, sexual assault, and misdemeanor battery.2 Prior to trial, the circuit court held a Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
that the Beckers were third-party beneficiaries. A trial was held and a jury awarded damages to the Beckers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35207 - 2009-02-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not understand him and had no idea what he was talking about. According to both Collins’ testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545307 - 2022-07-20

Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
National Gas at its customary rates. The trial court concluded it was not clear that the public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15609 - 2005-03-31