Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35141 - 35150 of 73672 for ha.
Search results 35141 - 35150 of 73672 for ha.
[PDF]
State v. William A. Rouse
has the authority to order restitution under a particular set of facts is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
has the authority to order restitution under a particular set of facts is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Albert Jackowski
showing that consent to entry for inspection purposes has been refused.”). 3 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3169 - 2017-09-19
showing that consent to entry for inspection purposes has been refused.”). 3 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3169 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 139
has recognized that a municipality may need to act outside its boundaries to plan for its future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39937 - 2009-09-28
has recognized that a municipality may need to act outside its boundaries to plan for its future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39937 - 2009-09-28
State v. Scott G. Waddell
565 (1986). The Supreme Court has held that, in determining whether an intrusion was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16165 - 2005-03-31
565 (1986). The Supreme Court has held that, in determining whether an intrusion was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16165 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 49
the governmental unit protected has after commencement of the coverage waived any right of recovery it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31848 - 2008-03-18
the governmental unit protected has after commencement of the coverage waived any right of recovery it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31848 - 2008-03-18
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
intent without deference. This standard of review has not been explicitly set out; however, Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
intent without deference. This standard of review has not been explicitly set out; however, Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
State v. Larry Jones
discretion. Id. A reviewing court may reverse the trial court only if it has failed to properly exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3309 - 2005-03-31
discretion. Id. A reviewing court may reverse the trial court only if it has failed to properly exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3309 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald W. McDaniel
. We address each basis seriatim. We first note, however, that a trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9107 - 2005-03-31
. We address each basis seriatim. We first note, however, that a trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9107 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we conclude that Hampton has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236555 - 2019-03-07
we conclude that Hampton has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236555 - 2019-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review, we conclude that B.M. has made a prima facie case of a defect in the plea colloquy and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728428 - 2023-11-14
review, we conclude that B.M. has made a prima facie case of a defect in the plea colloquy and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728428 - 2023-11-14