Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35151 - 35160 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 35151 - 35160 of 98406 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Roger E. Smiley
the presentence report, and the statements of counsel. The court considered Smiley’s record, as well as charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13637 - 2017-09-21
the presentence report, and the statements of counsel. The court considered Smiley’s record, as well as charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13637 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roger E. Smiley
the presentence report, and the statements of counsel. The court considered Smiley’s record, as well as charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13638 - 2017-09-21
the presentence report, and the statements of counsel. The court considered Smiley’s record, as well as charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13638 - 2017-09-21
James Knight v. Labor and Industry Review Commission of the Department of Industry
of fact. See id. Instead, the reviewing court must examine the record for substantial evidence which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12569 - 2005-03-31
of fact. See id. Instead, the reviewing court must examine the record for substantial evidence which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Knight v. Labor and Industry Review Commission of the Department of Industry
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1606 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12569 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1606 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has not done so. Upon this court’s independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753714 - 2024-01-23
, and has not done so. Upon this court’s independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753714 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has not done so. Upon this court’s independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753714 - 2024-01-23
, and has not done so. Upon this court’s independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753714 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the CHIPS court denied C.B. his right to counsel. The record also discloses no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189750 - 2017-09-21
that the CHIPS court denied C.B. his right to counsel. The record also discloses no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189750 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
). The prosecutor explained the plea bargain on the record and Lopez and his lawyer both informed the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115924 - 2014-06-29
). The prosecutor explained the plea bargain on the record and Lopez and his lawyer both informed the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115924 - 2014-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the trial court’s sentencing discretion. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623592 - 2023-02-21
to the trial court’s sentencing discretion. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623592 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the applicable range, and the record shows that the circuit court considered the facts relevant to the standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471349 - 2022-01-12
the applicable range, and the record shows that the circuit court considered the facts relevant to the standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471349 - 2022-01-12