Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35151 - 35160 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 35151 - 35160 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of counsel claim. The court of appeals held that the motion to modify the original sentence could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238995 - 2019-04-16
of counsel claim. The court of appeals held that the motion to modify the original sentence could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238995 - 2019-04-16
State v. Shaun P. Lynch
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Lynch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-03-31
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Lynch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, III, contends that: (1) the circuit court wrongly denied his pre-plea motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174613 - 2017-09-21
, III, contends that: (1) the circuit court wrongly denied his pre-plea motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174613 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
withdrawal motion. The motion asserted that Booker wanted to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18
withdrawal motion. The motion asserted that Booker wanted to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. The motion asserted that Booker wanted to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146852 - 2017-09-21
motion. The motion asserted that Booker wanted to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146852 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence as untimely. He challenges the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55888 - 2010-10-25
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence as untimely. He challenges the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55888 - 2010-10-25
CA Blank Order
. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Appointed counsel for Evans filed a motion to withdraw. Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106755 - 2014-01-09
. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Appointed counsel for Evans filed a motion to withdraw. Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106755 - 2014-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed and cause remanded; motion granted. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143895 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Affirmed and cause remanded; motion granted. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143895 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief.[1] Sterling argues that his postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief.[1] Sterling argues that his postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court order denying Singh’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas and an order denying Singh’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105521 - 2017-09-21
court order denying Singh’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas and an order denying Singh’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105521 - 2017-09-21