Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35161 - 35170 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35161 - 35170 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
in criminal proceedings. Sahs claims that Agent Krause check-marked this notification on the form, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
in criminal proceedings. Sahs claims that Agent Krause check-marked this notification on the form, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
Eric Winkelman v. Town of Delafield
a writ claiming conditions attached to a variance were invalid, has continuing jurisdiction over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16268 - 2005-03-31
a writ claiming conditions attached to a variance were invalid, has continuing jurisdiction over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16268 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Lipscomb
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lipscomb claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18837 - 2005-07-05
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lipscomb claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18837 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Mitchell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445511 - 2021-10-27
, Mitchell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445511 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
CA Blank Order
that standard. First, the record does not support Ross’s claim of undue pressure from his counsel to accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2015-04-13
that standard. First, the record does not support Ross’s claim of undue pressure from his counsel to accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2015-04-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
and negligence claims against The Selmer Company and its insurer. The circuit court concluded that Selmer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34171 - 2014-09-15
and negligence claims against The Selmer Company and its insurer. The circuit court concluded that Selmer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34171 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Bates claims the Town was not reasonably diligent in its attempts at personal service. The Town’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92451 - 2014-09-15
Bates claims the Town was not reasonably diligent in its attempts at personal service. The Town’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92451 - 2014-09-15