Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35161 - 35170 of 63551 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
agree. We reverse the judgments and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34673 - 2008-11-25

CA Blank Order
of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135204 - 2015-02-12

State v. James R. Harris
of record. See State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262, 265 (Ct. App. 1992), cert. denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to support his conviction.1 Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76882 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91455 - 2013-01-15

[PDF] NOTICE
264, 714 N.W.2d 530. My review of the record shows that this is not a clearly erroneous finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53527 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and records, we conclude at conference that these consolidated cases are appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638662 - 2023-03-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168413 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jerry L. Cox
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13643 - 2017-09-21