Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35171 - 35180 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35171 - 35180 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
his constitutional rights to him. At a postconviction motion hearing, the trial court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55951 - 2010-11-16
his constitutional rights to him. At a postconviction motion hearing, the trial court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55951 - 2010-11-16
State v. Cynthia A. Provo
and fourth offense operating while intoxicated. She also appeals an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5600 - 2005-03-31
and fourth offense operating while intoxicated. She also appeals an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion without prejudice and the parties conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30603 - 2014-09-15
for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion without prejudice and the parties conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30603 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Russell T. Cross appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234701 - 2019-02-12
). Russell T. Cross appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234701 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
judgment was entered against the Ades for failure to appear. Later the Ades’ attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14029 - 2014-09-15
judgment was entered against the Ades for failure to appear. Later the Ades’ attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14029 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this appeal is whether the circuit court erred in denying her suppression motion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432581 - 2021-09-30
in this appeal is whether the circuit court erred in denying her suppression motion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432581 - 2021-09-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cause. He also argues the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion because, regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184487 - 2017-09-21
cause. He also argues the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion because, regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184487 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard L. Harris
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31