Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 59008 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 59008 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Jeffrey L. Visnaw
motions for post-conviction relief. He claims that the trial court improperly declined to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8501 - 2005-03-31
motions for post-conviction relief. He claims that the trial court improperly declined to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that Harmon did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237710 - 2019-03-15
be arguable merit to a claim that Harmon did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237710 - 2019-03-15
Kenneth Jordan v. Stephen M. Puckett
facto laws. However, both state and federal courts in Wisconsin have previously rejected claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13098 - 2005-03-31
facto laws. However, both state and federal courts in Wisconsin have previously rejected claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13098 - 2005-03-31
Richard I. An v. Eleanor M. Tobon
. Here, Eleanor's and Norman's real estate expert claimed partition in kind physically suited the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10891 - 2005-03-31
. Here, Eleanor's and Norman's real estate expert claimed partition in kind physically suited the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10891 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith A. Rudolph
claims that Rudolph is judicially estopped from challenging a sentence to which he agreed. Rudolph does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26
claims that Rudolph is judicially estopped from challenging a sentence to which he agreed. Rudolph does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26
CA Blank Order
entered. The no-merit report next addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93436 - 2013-02-25
entered. The no-merit report next addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93436 - 2013-02-25
Terry K. Voice v. Mary Ellen Johnson
a $345 share of the $442 tax rebate. He also claims the court overvalued certain assets, undervalued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2876 - 2005-03-31
a $345 share of the $442 tax rebate. He also claims the court overvalued certain assets, undervalued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allan R. Washachek
2 claims the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
2 claims the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lonnie A. Mayer
a postconviction motion claiming that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the entrapment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21224 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction motion claiming that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the entrapment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirm. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252392 - 2020-01-10
affirm. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252392 - 2020-01-10