Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 61897 for does.

MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
authorization, an appeal does not involve a de novo determination on any matter but a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sandy J. Claude
does not develop her argument on this issue in her brief to this court. In her initial brief, six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Helen Schlicht v. Bridget Mary VanDyke
that the appendix to the appellants’ brief does not contain the entire transcript of the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6453 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
by the reduction in the charge to first-degree reckless homicide, a crime that does not include an element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. “The existence of a new factor does not, however, automatically entitle the defendant to relief.” The question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58253 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as it currently stands, which does carry with it the potential two strikes life imprisonment sentence as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
technically does not apply to this case,[1] we are satisfied that the circuit court’s sentencing remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] Quality Investments, Inc. v. Board of Review of the City of Superior
623, 626, 405 N.W.2d 344 (1987). If the board of review does not act arbitrarily or dishonestly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4581 - 2017-09-19

Waukesha County v. Michael Serwin
for the circuit court to reconsider its summary judgment. While § 805.17(3), Stats.,[1] does not apply in summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11534 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
does not constitute a misuse of that discretion. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15