Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 64190 for records.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 64190 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100535 - 2026-04-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100535 - 2026-04-07
Frontsheet
and that there was no evidence in the record that other claims would have been upheld. ¶21 The referee considered six glowing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33407 - 2008-07-14
and that there was no evidence in the record that other claims would have been upheld. ¶21 The referee considered six glowing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33407 - 2008-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of punishment, supervision and rehabilitation. The record does not show that Durante mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189103 - 2017-09-21
of punishment, supervision and rehabilitation. The record does not show that Durante mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not cite any legal authority or evidence in the record to support his assertion that Denise’s credit card
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78373 - 2014-09-15
not cite any legal authority or evidence in the record to support his assertion that Denise’s credit card
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
” throughout the record. On remittitur we direct the clerk of courts to determine the correct spelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
” throughout the record. On remittitur we direct the clerk of courts to determine the correct spelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that a reasonable court could reach based on the record before it. See id., ¶13. We defer because the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34289 - 2008-10-14
that a reasonable court could reach based on the record before it. See id., ¶13. We defer because the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34289 - 2008-10-14
State v. Willie C. Simpson
on record to say today.… And the only thing that I ask today, I didn’t ask this trial be stopped and I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4322 - 2005-03-31
on record to say today.… And the only thing that I ask today, I didn’t ask this trial be stopped and I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 805.17(2). While Swaine argues that there are facts in the record that she interprets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208205 - 2018-02-08
. STAT. § 805.17(2). While Swaine argues that there are facts in the record that she interprets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208205 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record to determine whether there “exists disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250938 - 2019-12-04
the record to determine whether there “exists disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250938 - 2019-12-04
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
was highly prejudicial and should have been excluded under the third step. We disagree. The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
was highly prejudicial and should have been excluded under the third step. We disagree. The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31