Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 84050 for simple case search.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 84050 for simple case search.
State v. Hiram Johnson
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2012-07-31
dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. On February 16, 2016, Vanhammond was charged in a second case with three counts of burglary, one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17
. On February 16, 2016, Vanhammond was charged in a second case with three counts of burglary, one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655255 - 2023-05-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655255 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to it. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
to it. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
trial, and (4) the court proceeded to trial without notice and while the case was on appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28318 - 2007-03-05
trial, and (4) the court proceeded to trial without notice and while the case was on appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28318 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
Janice L. Geline v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
the judgment against Barglind. This case arose as a result of a prior case, Geline v. Auto-Owners Insur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11454 - 2017-09-19
the judgment against Barglind. This case arose as a result of a prior case, Geline v. Auto-Owners Insur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
committed the first of the underlying crimes in this case. Burrage subsequently entered into a plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239786 - 2019-04-23
committed the first of the underlying crimes in this case. Burrage subsequently entered into a plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239786 - 2019-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
misdemeanors across two cases. 2 Garcia’s appellate 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
misdemeanors across two cases. 2 Garcia’s appellate 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
Janice L. Geline v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
. This case arose as a result of a prior case, Geline v. Auto-Owners Insur. Co., No. 95-0773, slip op. (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11454 - 2005-03-31
. This case arose as a result of a prior case, Geline v. Auto-Owners Insur. Co., No. 95-0773, slip op. (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11454 - 2005-03-31