Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 35181 - 35190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but disputed property division, child support and maintenance. ¶3 At trial, Andrea testified that she gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74634 - 2014-09-15
, but disputed property division, child support and maintenance. ¶3 At trial, Andrea testified that she gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74634 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 191
that it was an unfunded mandate. ¶8 The trial court granted Nytsch’s motion and dismissed the cases. In doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26065 - 2008-06-19
that it was an unfunded mandate. ¶8 The trial court granted Nytsch’s motion and dismissed the cases. In doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26065 - 2008-06-19
[PDF]
WI APP 191
of that request to the department. The judicial review shall be conducted at the time of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26065 - 2014-09-15
of that request to the department. The judicial review shall be conducted at the time of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26065 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark O. Williams
the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶3 Williams was incarcerated in the Door County jail awaiting trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶3 Williams was incarcerated in the Door County jail awaiting trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2009AP2596-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.06(1) (2007-08).2 On appeal, Allen challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54389 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP2596-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.06(1) (2007-08).2 On appeal, Allen challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54389 - 2014-09-15
County of Ozaukee v. Nancy L. Quelle
that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the results of her breath alcohol test because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the results of her breath alcohol test because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas P. Sterzinger
or pedestrian; and (2) that he did so knowingly. He also argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4018 - 2005-03-31
or pedestrian; and (2) that he did so knowingly. He also argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4018 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI App 195
complaint. The appellants contend that the trial court erred in concluding that their claim under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26559 - 2016-07-07
complaint. The appellants contend that the trial court erred in concluding that their claim under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26559 - 2016-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
that summary judgment was inappropriate in this case because—contrary to the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08
that summary judgment was inappropriate in this case because—contrary to the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to admit Jon’s preliminary examination testimony at trial and to admit other-acts evidence. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305169 - 2020-11-18
to admit Jon’s preliminary examination testimony at trial and to admit other-acts evidence. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305169 - 2020-11-18