Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35191 - 35200 of 56136 for so.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was advised that he had a right to respond, but he did not do so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105187 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
so excessive as to shock public sentiment. See Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107807 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110218 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254602 - 2020-02-26

[PDF] Supreme Court Statistics September 2024
to hear a case before the Court of Appeals has had the opportunity to do so. This type of request
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863182 - 2024-11-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not overturn the verdict “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, is so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Howell, 2006 WI App 182, No. 2005AP731-CR. Pickerign has done so by citing the plea questionnaire, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26856 - 2006-10-18

State v. Mary C. Rath
and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31

William E. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
to make an income or franchise tax return, who fails, neglects or refuses to do so in the manner and form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9089 - 2005-03-31

May a judge participate as a celebrity judge in a fund-raising event for a charitable organization?
not be read as proscribing participation in de minimis fund-raising activities so long as a judge is careful
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=898 - 2005-03-31