Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 24992 for extending.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 24992 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years of extended supervision.2 The circuit court denied eligibility to the Challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840012 - 2024-08-21
confinement and three years of extended supervision.2 The circuit court denied eligibility to the Challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840012 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and five years’ extended supervision. The court withheld sentence on the delivery of THC count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248717 - 2019-10-16
and five years’ extended supervision. The court withheld sentence on the delivery of THC count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248717 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
confinement and extended supervision. For the robbery, the trial court imposed a seven-year consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34359 - 2014-09-15
confinement and extended supervision. For the robbery, the trial court imposed a seven-year consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34359 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of no more than fifteen years’ initial confinement, leaving the extended supervision term to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101680 - 2017-09-21
of no more than fifteen years’ initial confinement, leaving the extended supervision term to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101680 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by two years’ extended supervision. ¶4 Because Lindblom was due 599 days’ sentence credit, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127589 - 2017-09-21
by two years’ extended supervision. ¶4 Because Lindblom was due 599 days’ sentence credit, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of five years of initial confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841119 - 2024-08-27
of five years of initial confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841119 - 2024-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State recommended consecutive sentences of one year of initial confinement and one year of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
, the State recommended consecutive sentences of one year of initial confinement and one year of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the parties free to argue as to the duration and terms of Grissett’s extended supervision. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968144 - 2025-06-10
the parties free to argue as to the duration and terms of Grissett’s extended supervision. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968144 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation for four years each of initial confinement and extended supervision. The circuit court instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102636 - 2017-09-21
recommendation for four years each of initial confinement and extended supervision. The circuit court instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
jointly recommended a sentence of eight years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240999 - 2019-06-11
jointly recommended a sentence of eight years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240999 - 2019-06-11