Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 6142 for sheriff.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 6142 for sheriff.
[PDF]
NOTICE
are not disputed. Deputy Sheriff Daniel Dittberner testified that he and a partner were patrolling in a marked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29132 - 2014-09-15
are not disputed. Deputy Sheriff Daniel Dittberner testified that he and a partner were patrolling in a marked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Waterford v. Kurt J. Doerr
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13708 - 2014-09-15
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13708 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
then asked her to forgive him and give him another chance. Deputy Sheriff Ron Ripley testified he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
then asked her to forgive him and give him another chance. Deputy Sheriff Ron Ripley testified he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).2 Buffalo County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251693 - 2019-12-23
, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).2 Buffalo County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251693 - 2019-12-23
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Steven Spring
The relevant facts are not disputed. Officer Paul Miller of the Dane County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10738 - 2017-09-20
The relevant facts are not disputed. Officer Paul Miller of the Dane County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10738 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Hogan
Deputy Sheriff Shane Heisser, who testified as follows. On April 3, 2003, at approximately 10:15 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21
Deputy Sheriff Shane Heisser, who testified as follows. On April 3, 2003, at approximately 10:15 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James F. Blask
, and released him only when a sheriff’s deputy appeared in response to a call for assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21
, and released him only when a sheriff’s deputy appeared in response to a call for assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21