Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 6141 for sheriff.
State v. Torrence D. Goss
assertions arising out of the investigation by the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Department and the Appleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3058 - 2005-03-31
assertions arising out of the investigation by the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Department and the Appleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J. Fury
On the evening of March 10, 1995, Deputy Sheriff Christopher Nelson was patrolling a tavern parking lot, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9959 - 2017-09-19
On the evening of March 10, 1995, Deputy Sheriff Christopher Nelson was patrolling a tavern parking lot, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9959 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
a prescription, both on the same day. Card is a sheriff’s deputy. The State’s burglary theory was that Card
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49414 - 2014-09-15
a prescription, both on the same day. Card is a sheriff’s deputy. The State’s burglary theory was that Card
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be pursued on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm. In November 2015, a Dane County sheriff’s deputy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253180 - 2020-01-28
be pursued on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm. In November 2015, a Dane County sheriff’s deputy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253180 - 2020-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
are not disputed. Deputy Sheriff Daniel Dittberner testified that he and a partner were patrolling in a marked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29132 - 2014-09-15
are not disputed. Deputy Sheriff Daniel Dittberner testified that he and a partner were patrolling in a marked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Waterford v. Kurt J. Doerr
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13708 - 2014-09-15
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13708 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
then asked her to forgive him and give him another chance. Deputy Sheriff Ron Ripley testified he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
then asked her to forgive him and give him another chance. Deputy Sheriff Ron Ripley testified he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29