Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 3521 - 3530 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Kenneth Urman v. Brian Barron
and a judgment setting aside a jury verdict, ordering a new trial in the interest of justice and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4176 - 2017-09-19
and a judgment setting aside a jury verdict, ordering a new trial in the interest of justice and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4176 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the operation of his vehicle. The trial court denied the Oppors’ postverdict motions to modify the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
in the operation of his vehicle. The trial court denied the Oppors’ postverdict motions to modify the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not negligent in the operation of his vehicle. The trial court denied the Oppors’ postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39993 - 2014-09-15
was not negligent in the operation of his vehicle. The trial court denied the Oppors’ postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39993 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Benson argues that the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82152 - 2012-05-07
postconviction motion. Benson argues that the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82152 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Mayer
A. Mayer appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for a third offense of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14514 - 2017-09-21
A. Mayer appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for a third offense of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14514 - 2017-09-21
State v. James J. Kempinski
contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion for an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8292 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion for an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8292 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 947.015 (2013-14). 1 He also appeals the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214772 - 2018-06-26
. § 947.015 (2013-14). 1 He also appeals the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214772 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
State v. James J. Kempinski
and was denied due process based on defects in the presentence report. He also contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8292 - 2017-09-19
and was denied due process based on defects in the presentence report. He also contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8292 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark A. Mayer
] Mark A. Mayer appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for a third offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14514 - 2005-03-31
] Mark A. Mayer appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for a third offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sally A. Gonnering v. David L. Gonnering
. David L. Gonnering appeals from two trial court orders. The first order reduced his maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8489 - 2017-09-19
. David L. Gonnering appeals from two trial court orders. The first order reduced his maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8489 - 2017-09-19