Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35201 - 35210 of 58277 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Kathleen Selaiden v. Columbia Hospital
1 Selaiden’s notice of appeal mistakenly characterizes the trial court’s order as a “judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4245 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Richard J. Anthuber
at the Racine Correctional Institution. Anthuber primarily contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9068 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Evelyn Hommrich v. Brown County Mental Health Center
program. The trial court concluded that Hommrich’s state law claims were No(s). 99-1009 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15397 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
concerns about judicial bias and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. At our request, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428672 - 2021-09-21

City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
on a citation alleging that he failed to pay a building permit fee in full. Hosale contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31

Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
] In November 1994, a La Crosse County case worker filed a petition with the trial court alleging that Steveon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8448 - 2005-03-31

Douglas Ingram v. David H. Schwarz
and Mawdsley,[1] JJ. PER CURIAM. Douglas Ingram has appealed pro se from a trial court order quashing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13669 - 2005-03-31

Nao S. Thao v. The Travelers Insurance Company
, it is 'the equivalent of a stipulation of facts permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10700 - 2005-03-31

Wayne K. Hermanson v. Horace Mann Insurance Company
, 427 N.W.2d 427 (Ct. App. 1988), preclude such a holding. We therefore reverse the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11414 - 2005-03-31

State v. April O.
and requested a jury trial. ¶3 The jury trial was scheduled for November 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16017 - 2005-03-31