Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 91512 for 1.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 91512 for 1.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2017AP1913 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Feliciano Douglas appeals the circuit court’s order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17
). No. 2017AP1913 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Feliciano Douglas appeals the circuit court’s order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17
[PDF]
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
. No. 2004AP2430 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jessica Rusch appeals a post-paternity order reaffirming a dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20725 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2004AP2430 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jessica Rusch appeals a post-paternity order reaffirming a dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20725 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested Kuklinski for driving under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested Kuklinski for driving under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: WILLIAM W. BRASH III, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32547 - 2014-09-15
County: WILLIAM W. BRASH III, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32547 - 2014-09-15
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
County: allan b. torhorst, Judge.[1] Affirmed. Before Brown, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
County: allan b. torhorst, Judge.[1] Affirmed. Before Brown, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 postconviction motion. Hvizdak’s brief is difficult
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 postconviction motion. Hvizdak’s brief is difficult
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
Robert Macemon v. Jessica Christie
is identical to Macemon’s original challenge to the validity of the DOC’s action.[1] Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
is identical to Macemon’s original challenge to the validity of the DOC’s action.[1] Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: William M. McMonigal, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44852 - 2009-12-22
: William M. McMonigal, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44852 - 2009-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Riley appeals a summary judgment in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30071 - 2007-08-27
and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Riley appeals a summary judgment in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30071 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29
or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29