Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Production Components-Cloeren, Inc. v. Robert Shakal
theory supporting its claim and must direct the trial court’s attention to issues that are being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4837 - 2005-03-31
theory supporting its claim and must direct the trial court’s attention to issues that are being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4837 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Achenbach
credit and an order clarifying the record. Achenbach claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
credit and an order clarifying the record. Achenbach claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
1 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7754 - 2017-09-19
1 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7754 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brett M. Trenter
. Trenter claims that the trial court erred in reaching this conclusion because the “Informing the Accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9782 - 2005-03-31
. Trenter claims that the trial court erred in reaching this conclusion because the “Informing the Accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9782 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrell T. Dalton
assistance of counsel claim. To prevail on this argument, Dalton would have to show that (1) his counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10618 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel claim. To prevail on this argument, Dalton would have to show that (1) his counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
1 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7751 - 2017-09-19
1 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7751 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion by not reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion by not reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Brett M. Trenter
. Trenter claims that the trial court erred in reaching this conclusion because the “Informing the Accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
. Trenter claims that the trial court erred in reaching this conclusion because the “Informing the Accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
% of the initial confinement time before raising a claim based on a change in a sentencing law, it cannot fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
% of the initial confinement time before raising a claim based on a change in a sentencing law, it cannot fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31