Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and [5] whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
be accurate, reliable and objective. Id. at 518. ¶10 When claiming that bias taints a PSI, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4659 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
from his trial counsel, or, alternatively, in the interest of justice. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191890 - 2017-09-21

State v. David R. Messner
respect and affirm. ¶3 A claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15622 - 2005-03-31

WI App 43 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP135 Complete Title of ...
”), the creditor, Community Credit Plan, Inc. (“Community Credit”) brought small-claims replevin actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78914 - 2012-04-24

State v. Douglas Wolff
) and an order denying postconviction relief. He makes four claims: (1) trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and submissions, we conclude that Daniels could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and submissions, we conclude that Daniels could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26

State v. Jackie C.
not claim that his waiver of a fact-finding hearing was uninformed or involuntary. And on appeal, he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5339 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael J. Stuempfig
).[2] He claims that his arrest was unlawful, that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09