Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 63197 for records.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 63197 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders, to determine the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60825 - 2011-03-08
court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders, to determine the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60825 - 2011-03-08
State v. Carl J. Johnson, Jr.
concluded that the “record does not show that parole policy was a factor that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
concluded that the “record does not show that parole policy was a factor that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557216 - 2022-08-23
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557216 - 2022-08-23
Joseph Anthuber v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company
a discretionary decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9083 - 2005-03-31
a discretionary decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9083 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Portage v. Boyd A. Trachsel
credible than Trachsel’s testimony. The circuit court also stated that the records the officers kept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15438 - 2017-09-21
credible than Trachsel’s testimony. The circuit court also stated that the records the officers kept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15438 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
State v. Kenneth R. Parrish
that the trial court should have conducted a discharge hearing. The record reflects that between August 12, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27
that the trial court should have conducted a discharge hearing. The record reflects that between August 12, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the circuit court’s orders because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=706593 - 2023-09-26
and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the circuit court’s orders because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=706593 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
mandatory duty to order restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
mandatory duty to order restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16

