Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35241 - 35250 of 82834 for case search.
Search results 35241 - 35250 of 82834 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
rights to Angellika were terminated. DISCUSSION ¶4 The question presented in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37587 - 2009-07-13
rights to Angellika were terminated. DISCUSSION ¶4 The question presented in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37587 - 2009-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101575 - 2013-09-03
to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101575 - 2013-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District ...
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District I
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92875 - 2013-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District I
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92875 - 2013-02-11
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of Sugden’s knowledge as the case was presented to the jury. ¶6 When determining the probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
of Sugden’s knowledge as the case was presented to the jury. ¶6 When determining the probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as applied in violation of the separation of powers because the executive branch is defending the case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977445 - 2025-07-01
as applied in violation of the separation of powers because the executive branch is defending the case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977445 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218461 - 2018-08-30
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218461 - 2018-08-30
[PDF]
County of LaCrosse v. G. Bradford Merkl
his case was called, he stated that he wished to have a trial before a jury because he had paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9149 - 2017-09-19
his case was called, he stated that he wished to have a trial before a jury because he had paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Siu Wing Leung v. City of Lake Geneva
2003 WI App 129 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2747
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5771 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 129 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2747
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5771 - 2017-09-19
Robert Owens, Jr. v. Shoreline Real Estate Co., Inc.
affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This dispute arises from a landlord-tenant case. Owens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7088 - 2005-03-31
affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This dispute arises from a landlord-tenant case. Owens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7088 - 2005-03-31