Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35251 - 35260 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 35251 - 35260 of 82833 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Justin H.
for him. The trial court acknowledged that there are some cases where a child is not afforded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9425 - 2017-09-19
for him. The trial court acknowledged that there are some cases where a child is not afforded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9425 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
of his trial. He even concedes that because Jodie W. was not yet law at the time his case was decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
of his trial. He even concedes that because Jodie W. was not yet law at the time his case was decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. In this subrogation case, Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140518 - 2017-09-21
, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. In this subrogation case, Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140518 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
on it. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147270 - 2015-09-01
on it. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147270 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
, the County was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17747 - 2017-09-21
, the County was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17747 - 2017-09-21
State v. John R. Calkins
may not collaterally attack a prior conviction in a subsequent criminal case where the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
may not collaterally attack a prior conviction in a subsequent criminal case where the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
supreme court case.”) ¶9 As for the Mazemkes’ second request, we begin our analysis by briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110001 - 2014-04-08
supreme court case.”) ¶9 As for the Mazemkes’ second request, we begin our analysis by briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110001 - 2014-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the many cases in this state where either we or our supreme court found facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
the many cases in this state where either we or our supreme court found facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18