Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35261 - 35270 of 63980 for records/1000.
Search results 35261 - 35270 of 63980 for records/1000.
State v. James R. Harris
of record. See State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262, 265 (Ct. App. 1992), cert. denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31
of record. See State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262, 265 (Ct. App. 1992), cert. denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103229 - 2013-10-16
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103229 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
request for resentencing before a different judge. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109015 - 2017-09-21
request for resentencing before a different judge. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109015 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2)(a) requires a circuit court to demonstrate on the record that it considered the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33254 - 2014-09-15
(2)(a) requires a circuit court to demonstrate on the record that it considered the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33254 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not make any findings on the record regarding whether disclosure “would result in imminent danger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526857 - 2022-06-01
not make any findings on the record regarding whether disclosure “would result in imminent danger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526857 - 2022-06-01
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117324 - 2014-07-22
independent review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117324 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
was also offered.1 The record also contains Beyer's presentence report, which states that on March 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11889 - 2017-09-21
was also offered.1 The record also contains Beyer's presentence report, which states that on March 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He has not directed us to anywhere in the record where he presented such an affidavit, or any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27429 - 2014-09-15
. He has not directed us to anywhere in the record where he presented such an affidavit, or any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
Ann Lorraine VanCauteren v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
if the trial court examined the facts of record, applied the proper legal standard, and reached a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13608 - 2017-09-21
if the trial court examined the facts of record, applied the proper legal standard, and reached a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13608 - 2017-09-21