Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
his constitutional rights to him. At a postconviction motion hearing, the trial court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55951 - 2010-11-16
his constitutional rights to him. At a postconviction motion hearing, the trial court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55951 - 2010-11-16
State v. Allen Tony Davis
the motion. ¶3 Davis then requested to proceed pro se, and informed the court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15911 - 2005-03-31
the motion. ¶3 Davis then requested to proceed pro se, and informed the court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15911 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jarrett M. Adams
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4802 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4802 - 2005-03-31
State v. Herbert W. McGee
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. McGee argues that: (1) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12222 - 2005-03-31
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. McGee argues that: (1) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12222 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wilfredo Melo
cocaine. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
cocaine. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Staples
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, Staples argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, Staples argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
State v. Steven W. Anderson
, P.J.[1] Steven Anderson appeals a circuit court order denying a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31
, P.J.[1] Steven Anderson appeals a circuit court order denying a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 68
his motion to suppress.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2 The essential facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
his motion to suppress.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2 The essential facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. The motion asked that claims against Bartelt and Filo individually be dismissed because they acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2006-11-28
. The motion asked that claims against Bartelt and Filo individually be dismissed because they acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2006-11-28